Raptors Need To Go Over The Luxury Tax Threshold and Become a Contender

 By RaptorTalk

There’s been a lot of discussion lately about the Toronto Raptors having their hands tied because they are a slim $1,100 below the luxury tax threshold.

I don’t think that matters to Bryan Colangelo.
He knows there are holes in this team and it is not unreasonable to assume he makes a bold move – even if it means paying some tax.

                     

Look, Bryan didn't acquire Jermaine O'Neal so the Raptors could finish 41-41 again.

Facts are that ex-GM Rob Babcock was run out of town because MLSE was terrified by the prospect of a collapse of the season ticket base which would lead to a significant decline in the value of the franchise. Bryan Colangelo was brought in to bring a winner fast - and stay there! MLSE does not want another 'five year rebuilding plan' and a step-back this year is not in the Raptors plans.

Based on that, I don't think that MLSE is overly concerned about the luxury tax IF Bryan can make a trade which puts the Raptors into the upper eschelon of the NBA.

This is the exact same situation Boston faced last year. They had two superstars (Pierce and Allen) and knew they needed a third all-star to move to the next level - even though Kevin Garnett put them into luxury tax territory.


41-41 will hit MLSE in the pocketbook

Let’s assume the Raptors finish at 41-41 - which is not unrealistic. One could assume a loss of at least 1,000 season seat holders (comparable to this year's drop).

A loss of only 900 lower bowl season ticket holders equals a loss of $7 million in revenue.

Plus, MLSE won’t be getting those STH's back anytime soon - so the loss can be multiplied over a number of years. With the present tough economy, it won't be easy to find people willing to drop big bucks on Platinums to replace those STH's who don't renew.

Plus, if the Raptors struggle and fail to make the play-offs, you can add another loss of $4 to $6 million in lost revenue per playoff round.

In a worse case scenario where the Raptors miss the playoffs and lose season seat holders, MLSE could see a loss of $10 to $15 million by standing pat. It is entirely possible to see a loss of $20 million between lost playoff revenue and season seat cancellations.

So, despite the loss the threat of becoming a luxury tax payer - there is a plausible scenario whereby it makes financial sense for the Raptors to go over the luxury tax threshold.


The Raptors need their own big three

If the Raptors can trade Parker + Hump and/or Kapono and acquire an elite swing man with 3 years left on his contract - I think they go for it.

Imagine a team with Chris Bosh, Jermaine O'Neal, Jose Calderon and new superstar “X” at Small Forward, along with an ever-improving Andrea Bargnani off the bench. The Raptors could definitely challenge Boston!

Talent wins, baby! And the Raptors have some elite talent in place - but they are missing a piece to the puzzle. However, a creative Colangelo should be able to make the move the Raps need to become serious Eastern Conference contenders.


What if Bosh gets disillusioned and leaves?

The other issue in play is that I don't think MLSE is willing to stumble through this season at .500 and potentially see Bosh leave in 2010. If they are, then next season the Raptors need to be prepared to let Jermaine O’Neal's contract expire and trade Chris Bosh for picks and young players. Of course, that means starting the rebuilding process all over again.

IMO, IF Bryan sees the right trade scenario (to acquire an elite SG or SF), he will definitely pull the trigger - even if it puts Toronto into luxury tax territory.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 11/24/2008 9:13 PM David Stern wrote:
    i don't know if you understand how the salary cap works.

    you can't just 'go over' if you don't mind paying the tax. going over the cap is against the rules. its a hard cap.

    teams go over the salary cap through an 'exception', and then the pay the luxury tax.

    RaptorTalk replies: Dear Mr. Stern .... you are mistaken. The NBA Salary Cap is not a 'hard cap' like the NHL. It is a 'soft cap' which can be exceeded through a number of exceptions including the TRADED PLAYER EXCEPTION. This exemption allows teams to take back up to 25% MORE in salary than they trade away. If draft picks are included, then even more salary can be taken back. We are suggesting that the Raptors trade lesser expiring contracts (and possibly a draft pick for the right deal) in return for salaries that may well put them over the luxury tax threshold. All within the rules. This is exactly the route Boston took to put them into luxury tax territory.
    Reply to this
  • 12/4/2008 11:55 AM Andrew wrote:
    I really believe that the Raptors should make a deal to bring Vince Carter back. I think sending Anthony Parker, Jason Kapono and a draft pick to New Jersey for Vince would be a trade that would benefit both teams. New Jersey would save at least $9M + whatever Vince is scheduled to make in the future since Anthony Parker's contract is gonna be up at the end of the season. They can use that money to put towards the free agent bonanza in 2010 (they'll most likely target Lebron). The Raptors could still stay around the Salary Cap limit through this trade if they use the "Allen Houston Rule" on Jorge Garbaosa's contract. There are a lot of benefits through this trade for both teams and it's a win-win. The Nets Rebuild and the Raptors have their own "Big Three". Also personally, I'm a big fan of Humphries and I wouldn't trade him. He's pure hustle.
    Reply to this
  • 1/29/2009 9:43 AM YachtCharter Griechenland wrote:
    Good post, but have you thought about Raptors Need To Go Over The Luxury Tax Threshold and Become a Contender before?
    Reply to this
  • 3/22/2010 6:02 AM Pop Up Banner Stands wrote:
    I'm a big Raptors fan. Spend to be better.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.